Reasoner
Ask, and Oria reasons over governed data and institutional memory. Dashboards, maps, simulators, relationship graphs, timelines and work boards come out of the conversation, not out of a ticket.
The super agent that knows how your organization works.
Oria runs on ARPIA, the platform underneath, so it reads the ERP, CRM and data platforms you already run through a governed reflection of them. And it knows your organization because every account arrives with Cerebro, the institutional memory that holds the decisions, rules and procedures your people already wrote down. Your team asks, analyses, builds and acts from the first session, with budgets and an audit trail. You can start this week: no platform project, no business case, no nine months of procurement.
The usual path to governed enterprise AI runs through vendor onboarding, security review, legal, a justified use case and a pilot. Eight to twelve weeks before anyone touches anything, and often the better part of a year before the first result.
Meanwhile your people are already using AI. Just not yours, and not governed.
Oria inverts the order. Seats first, governed from day one, and the use case emerges from what your people actually do with it.
Seats are billed per day. Add someone on a Tuesday and you pay from Tuesday. Adoption spreads because it is allowed to, not because a committee approved a rollout.
Oria is not a chat window bolted onto your data. It reasons, builds, authors and executes, and every one of those runs inside the same governed session, on the ontology and permissions the business already defined. Each one has a demo, no slideware.
Ask, and Oria reasons over governed data and institutional memory. Dashboards, maps, simulators, relationship graphs, timelines and work boards come out of the conversation, not out of a ticket.
Generation constrained by your ontology and your security policies, with a review gate before anything ships. The standards are the guardrails, not a code review afterwards.
Author the ontology itself: nodes, relations and the tables behind them, with permission gates on propose, apply and sample. This is where the DNA of the business gets written down.
A governed execution environment. Code runs in its own pod with your ontology scope and permissions, human approval where it matters, and its own persistent storage.
The spreadsheet somebody maintains by hand is where most of the real operating knowledge of a company lives. Oria takes it, understands it next to your governed data, and gives back a working tool rather than a summary of it.
Excel or CSV into the session. It lands in the object store, shows up as a file in the exploration, and the agent reads it alongside the nodes you already gave it.
Not a summary of the sheet. A dashboard, a map, a simulator, a work board, or a small application over that data, built in the session and pinned there.
Connect your own accounts through MCP with your own sign in. The agent uses them as tools in the same session, under the permissions your organization already set.
The work executes in its own governed environment with approval where it matters, keeps its own persistent storage, and can be promoted from your workspace to the organization's.
That is the difference between an assistant that drafts and one that builds. The spreadsheet stops being a file somebody emails around, and becomes a tool with governed data behind it, an audit trail, and a memory of why it works the way it does.
Most companies already have an enterprise chat assistant. It answers well, and then the work starts: you take the answer somewhere else to analyse it, and somewhere else again to build anything with it. It can only reach what somebody already wrote down, and the decision taken in a meeting or the rule that surfaced while debugging is not in there, because nobody ever typed it. That is also the knowledge that walks out when a senior person resigns.
The point is the whole cycle in one governed place: ask, analyse, build, decide, act, and the record accumulates while you do it. The part that is hard to copy is not the memory, it is that the memory lives beside the ontology. When a memory says how churn is calculated, the node that calculates it is one step away, with its lineage and its governed actions. A memory layer on its own is a two quarter build for anyone. That is why this sits on a data platform and not on a search index.
It scales down as well as up. A team of twenty gets the same governed cycle as a company of three thousand, at the price of the seats they actually use.
ARPIA is certified under ISO 42001 and SOC 2 Type II, and Oria inherits that infrastructure. Your own compliance stays yours to run, but the governance layer is not something you have to build first.
Not an add-on to configure later. Every account is provisioned with its institutional memory ready and embedded in Oria, switched on in every session, for the Reasoner and for the Workbench.
Six months in, you have not just been using AI. You have a written record of how your organization reasons.
And it is not held hostage. The same corpus is readable from the AI tools your people already use, through MCP. The pitch is not stay because your memory is here. It is work wherever you want, this is where it accumulates.
It starts empty and gets better with use, so we seed it during onboarding with the documents, tickets and wikis you already have. Oria begins knowing something, and from there the work keeps it alive.
Every one of these ends in something governed: a pipeline that ran, a board that is live, a decision with its lineage attached. Not a document somebody has to carry to the next tool.
Oria maps the exposure, diagnoses what changed, prescribes the action and activates it into the ERP, with human approval where the money moves.
Out: a governed pipeline that ran. Collections went from days to 13 minutes, trigger to ERP, in production at a financial services group.Running objects, errors, what is waiting on a person. Operations stops asking whether a flow ran and starts seeing it.
Out: a live operations board. Metrics and object states update as the work happens.Competition, inventory and sales history combined into a recommendation you can interrogate, because the reasoning that produced it is attached to it.
Out: a recommendation with its lineage. Analysis that took weeks resolves in minutes.Which model ran, on what context, under which policy, approved by whom. Budgets are enforced before the spend, not discovered on the invoice.
Out: an audit trail you can hand over. Built for scoring and decisioning that has to answer to a regulator.Lineage that covers the tables and the reasoning objects on top of them: pipelines, nodes and the apps that read them, in one graph.
Out: lineage across data and reasoning. Most tools trace tables and stop there.Generation constrained by the ontology and the security policies, with a review gate before anything ships, and code that runs in its own governed pod.
Out: reviewed work, not a prototype. The guardrails are the standards, not a code review afterwards.Three levels, billed per seat per day, so a seat added mid month costs what it used. The AI itself is paid separately and you set the ceiling.
For putting governed AI in everyone's hands.
For the people who want to build their own tools.
For whoever owns the ontology and the governance.
Because you are not buying intelligence by the seat. AI consumption runs on a prepaid AI Wallet, a shared pool you size and control, billed on what was actually used. That is what keeps a governed seat at five dollars instead of sixty.
Connect your own provider accounts or keys and the tokens stay on your bill. ARPIA charges a flat governance fee of $1 per million tokens, whatever the provider or model tier, for the budgeting, assignment, audit and policy that traffic passes through.
Your people work with governed AI. Spend is capped, every session is auditable.
Findings accumulate with attribution. The organization starts recognising its own knowledge.
Power users build personal applications. The useful ones get noticed by the people beside them.
What the business calls its entities gets written down and governed, by the people who know.
Now a use case is obvious, scoped and defensible, because it came out of the work instead of a slide. That is when our teams build with you.
Tell us how many people and what they work on. Thirty minutes is enough to size the seats and the wallet, and your team can be working the same week.
Tell us who starts and what they work on. Thirty minutes on a call is enough to confirm it, and your team can be working the same week.